Appointment Packet

Everything chambers or opposing counsel needs to evaluate a candidate.

A concise, forwardable summary of qualifications, representative appointments, and engagement mechanics. Save it as a PDF to attach to a proposed order or circulate to the other parties.

Start a conflicts check

Daniel B. Garrie is a court-appointed technical special master, discovery referee, and forensic neutral who resolves disputes whose substance turns on technical fact — source code, e-discovery, cybersecurity and data forensics, and artificial-intelligence systems. He has served in more than one hundred court-appointed and expert-witness matters and is a neutral with JAMS.

Snapshot

Qualifications at a glance

Role
Technical special master, discovery referee, forensic neutral
Engagements
100+ court-appointed & expert-witness matters
Panel
JAMS neutral (since 2016); W.D. Pa. e-discovery special master panel
Faculty
Adjunct Professor, Harvard University (since 2020)
Bar
New York (2007); Washington (2012); U.S. Supreme Court
Patents
Co-inventor, 4 U.S. cybersecurity patents

Domains

Technical domains

  • Source code review — authorship, copying, provenance, and functional equivalence under protective order.
  • E-discovery disputes — custodians, search methodology, technology-assisted review, preservation, and proportionality.
  • Cybersecurity & data forensics — intrusion reconstruction, exfiltration, chain of custody, and spoliation.
  • AI & algorithmic systems — model behavior, training data, reproducibility, and explainability.

Experience

Representative appointments

In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation (N.D. Cal.) — appointed by the Honorable Vince Chhabria as eDiscovery Special Master; issued dozens of orders and oversaw dozens of technical depositions concerning cloud architecture and distributed systems.

LA Alliance for Human Rights v. City of Los Angeles (C.D. Cal.) — service as a court-appointed monitor in a complex matter under continuing court supervision.

Additional engagements, described by role out of respect for confidentiality, include: special master in an employment class action (ESI protocol and spoliation across servers, mobile devices, and cloud systems); discovery referee in the Los Angeles Superior Court across dozens of device and enterprise-software disputes; forensic neutral in trade-secret matters with claims in the hundreds of millions; and forensic neutral in the S.D.N.Y. identifying and removing sensitive and classified data.

Credentials

Education, faculty, and scholarship

  • J.D., Rutgers School of Law; M.A. & B.A., Computer Science, Brandeis University.
  • Adjunct Professor, Harvard University — Cybersecurity Law, Cryptocurrency & Smart Contracts, Computer Forensics.
  • Author of Understanding Software, the Internet, Mobile Computing, and the Cloud: A Guide for Judges (Federal Judicial Center, 2015), and of more than 400 articles; scholarship cited in 500+ articles and court opinions.
  • Fellow & Distinguished Neutral, Academy of Court Appointed Masters/Neutrals; Distinguished Neutral, CPR Institute; member, The Sedona Conference (WG1 & WG6).

Engagement

How an engagement works

An engagement begins with a conflicts check and a scoping conversation, at no obligation. The court enters an order of reference under Rule 53 (or a state analogue) fixing the master’s duties, the materials to be examined, the protective-order protocol, compensation and its allocation under Rule 53(g), and the standard of review under Rule 53(f). Annotated model orders for e-discovery, source-code inspection, and forensic examination are available in the resource library.

Contact

Daniel B. Garrie · Law & Forensics LLC · info@lawandforensics.com

This packet is informational, creates no engagement, and is not legal advice.

Start a conflicts check