Daniel B. Garrie, Esq.
Technical Special Master · Discovery Referee · Forensic Neutral
Daniel B. Garrie is a court-appointed technical special master, discovery referee, and forensic neutral who resolves disputes whose substance turns on technical fact — source code, e-discovery, cybersecurity and data forensics, and artificial-intelligence systems. He has served in more than one hundred court-appointed and expert-witness matters and is a neutral with JAMS.
Snapshot
Qualifications at a glance
- Role
- Technical special master, discovery referee, forensic neutral
- Engagements
- 100+ court-appointed & expert-witness matters
- Panel
- JAMS neutral (since 2016); W.D. Pa. e-discovery special master panel
- Faculty
- Adjunct Professor, Harvard University (since 2020)
- Bar
- New York (2007); Washington (2012); U.S. Supreme Court
- Patents
- Co-inventor, 4 U.S. cybersecurity patents
Domains
Technical domains
- Source code review — authorship, copying, provenance, and functional equivalence under protective order.
- E-discovery disputes — custodians, search methodology, technology-assisted review, preservation, and proportionality.
- Cybersecurity & data forensics — intrusion reconstruction, exfiltration, chain of custody, and spoliation.
- AI & algorithmic systems — model behavior, training data, reproducibility, and explainability.
Experience
Representative appointments
In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation (N.D. Cal.) — appointed by the Honorable Vince Chhabria as eDiscovery Special Master; issued dozens of orders and oversaw dozens of technical depositions concerning cloud architecture and distributed systems.
LA Alliance for Human Rights v. City of Los Angeles (C.D. Cal.) — service as a court-appointed monitor in a complex matter under continuing court supervision.
Additional engagements, described by role out of respect for confidentiality, include: special master in an employment class action (ESI protocol and spoliation across servers, mobile devices, and cloud systems); discovery referee in the Los Angeles Superior Court across dozens of device and enterprise-software disputes; forensic neutral in trade-secret matters with claims in the hundreds of millions; and forensic neutral in the S.D.N.Y. identifying and removing sensitive and classified data.
Credentials
Education, faculty, and scholarship
- J.D., Rutgers School of Law; M.A. & B.A., Computer Science, Brandeis University.
- Adjunct Professor, Harvard University — Cybersecurity Law, Cryptocurrency & Smart Contracts, Computer Forensics.
- Author of Understanding Software, the Internet, Mobile Computing, and the Cloud: A Guide for Judges (Federal Judicial Center, 2015), and of more than 400 articles; scholarship cited in 500+ articles and court opinions.
- Fellow & Distinguished Neutral, Academy of Court Appointed Masters/Neutrals; Distinguished Neutral, CPR Institute; member, The Sedona Conference (WG1 & WG6).
Engagement
How an engagement works
An engagement begins with a conflicts check and a scoping conversation, at no obligation. The court enters an order of reference under Rule 53 (or a state analogue) fixing the master’s duties, the materials to be examined, the protective-order protocol, compensation and its allocation under Rule 53(g), and the standard of review under Rule 53(f). Annotated model orders for e-discovery, source-code inspection, and forensic examination are available in the resource library.
Contact
Daniel B. Garrie · Law & Forensics LLC · info@lawandforensics.com
This packet is informational, creates no engagement, and is not legal advice.